Bibliografia
1. Vasconcelos EKF, Borges LS, Silva AL, Andrade TV, Santos ET, Sousa SC Jr, et al Comportamento
de suõÂnos na fase de crescimento criados em ambiente enriquecido. J Anim Behav Biomet. 2015; 3:
120-123.
2. HoÈtzel MJ, Machado Filho, Bem-estar Animal na Agricultura do SeÂculo XXI. R Etologia. 2004; 6: 03-
15.
3. Campos J, TinoÃco IFF, Silva FF, Pupa JMR, Silva IJO. Enriquecimento ambiental para leitoes na fase
de creche advindos de desmame aos 21 e 28 dias. R Bras Cien Agr. 2010; 5:272-278.
4. Mason G, Clubb R, Latham N, Vickery S. Why and how should we use environmental enrichment to
tackle stereotypic behaviour? Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2007; 102: 163-188.
5. Van de Weerd HA, Docking CM, Day JEL, Avery PJ, Edwards SA. A systematic approach towards
developing environmental enrichment for pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2003; 84: 101-118.
6. Docking CM, Van de Weerd HA, Day JEL, Edwards SA. The influence of age on the use of potential
enrichment objects and synchronisation of behaviour of pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2008; 110: 244-
257.
7. Trickett SL, Guy JH, Edwards SA. The role of novelty in environmental enrichment for the weane Appl
Anim Behav Sci. 2009; 116(1), 45-51.
8. Foppa L. Enriquecimento ambiental e comportamento de suõÂnos. M.Sc. Dissertation, Universidade
Federal da Grande Dourados. 2015. d pig. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2009; 116: 45-51.
9. Jones JB, Carmichael NL, Wathes CM, White RP, Jones RB. The effects of acute simultaneous exposure
to ammonia on the detection of buried odourized food by pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000, 65:
305-319.
10. Pandorfi H, Silva IJO, Carvalho JL, Piedade SMS. Estudo do comportamento bioclima tico de matrizes
suõÂnas alojadas em baias individuais e coletivas, com ênfase no bem-estar animal na fase de gestacao.
R Eng Rural. 2006; 17: 1-10.
11. Rydhmer L, LundstroÈm K, Andersson K. Immunocastration reduces aggressive and sexual behaviour in
male pigs', Animal. 2010, 4: 965-972. doi: 10.1017/S175173111000011X PMID: 22444270
Behavior of Pigs in Enriched Environment
PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0168427 January 6, 2017 16 / 18
12. Silva FAS, Azevedo CAV. A new version of the Assistat -Statistical Assistance Software. In: WORLD
CONGRESS ON COMPUTERS IN AGRICULTURE, 4., 2006, Orlando. Proceedings. Reno, RV:
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 393-396.
13. Leite DMG, Silva MA, Medeiros RB, Saibro JC, Pavan MA, Zanella JA,et al. Comportamento de suõÂnos
submetidos a diferentes sistemas de pastejo em pastagem de trevo-branco. R Bras Zoot. 2006; 35:
1774-1779.
14. Broom DM, Fraser AF. Comportamento e bem-estar de animais domeÂsticos. 4th ed. Barueri: Manole;
2010.
15. Pedersen BK, Curtis SE, Kelley KW, Gonyou WH. Well-being in growing finishing pigs: environmental
enrichment and pen space allowance. In: Collins, E., Boon, C. (Eds.), Livestock Environment IV: Fourth
International Symposium, University of Warwick, Coventry, England, 1993. American Society of Agricultural
Engineers, St. Joseph, MI. 1993.
16. Hemsworth PH, Tillbrook AJ. Sexual behaviour of male pigs. Horm Behav. 2007; 52: 39-44. doi: 10.
1016/j.yhbeh.2007.03.013 PMID: 17499251
17. Fraser AF, Broom DM. Farm animal behaviour and welfare. 3rd ed. London: Baillière Tindall; 1990.
18. Petersen V, Simonsen HB, Lawson LG. The effect of environmental stimulation on the development of
behaviour in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1995; 45(3): 215-224.
19. Studnitz M, Jensen MB, Pedersen LJ. Why do pigs root and in what will they root?: A review on the
exploratory behaviour of pigs in relation to environmental enrichment. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2007; 107:
183-197.
20. Grandin T, Johnson C. Bem-estar dos animais. 1st ed. Sao Paulo: Rocco; 2009.
21. Zonderland JJ, Vermeer HM, Vereijken PFG, Spoolder HAM. Measuring a pig's preference for suspended
toys by using an automated recording technique. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium
of the C.I.G.R. Anim Welfare Considerations in Livestock Housing Systems, Second Technical
Section, p 147-156. 2008.
22. Gifford AK, Cloutier S, Newberry RC. Objects as enrichment: Effects of object exposure time and delay
interval on object recognition memory of the domestic pig. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2007; 107; 3-4, 206-
217. 2007.
23. Santos RKS. Behavior and performance of immunocastrated pigs. M.Sc. Dissertation, Federal University
of Grande Dourados; 2014.
24. Poletto R, Steibel JP, Siegford JM, Zanella JA. Effects of early weaning and social isolation on the
expression of glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor and 11h-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 1
and 2 mRNAs in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of piglets. Brain Res. 2010; 1067: 36-42.
25. Cronin GM, Dunshea FR, Butler KL, McCauley I, Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH. The effects of immuneand
surgical-castration on the behaviour and consequently growth of group- housed, male finisher pigs.
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2003; 81:111-126.
26. Albrecht AK, Beilage EG, Kanitz E, Puppe B, Traulsen I, Krieter J. Influence of immunisation against
GnRF on agonistic and mounting behaviour, serum testosterone concentration and body weight in male
pigs compared with boars and barrows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2012; 138: 28-35.
27. Rydhmer LG, Zamaratskaia G, Anderssonc HK, Algersd B, Guillemete R, LundstroÈmb K. Aggressive
and sexual behaviour of growing and finishing pigs reared in groups, without castration. Acta Agr Scand
A-An. 2006; 56; 109-119.
28. Amory JR, Pearce GP. Alarm pheromones in urine modify the behaviour of weaner pigs Anim Welfare.
2000; 9: 167-175.
29. McGlone JJ, Anderson DL. Synthetic maternal pheromone stimulates feeding behavior and weight gain
in weaned pigs. J Anim Sci. 2002; 80: 3179-3183. PMID: 12542158
30. Friend TH, Knabe DA, Tanksley TD Jr. Behavior and performance of pigs grouped by three different
methods at weaning. J Anim Sci. 1982; 57: 1406-1411.
31. Sarubbi J. TeÂcnicas de manejo voltadas para o BEA em suõÂnos. In: ProducËão de SuõÂnos- Teoria e Pra -
tica. AssociacËão Brasileira dos Produtores de SuõÂnos. BrasõÂlia; 2014. p. 146-155.
32. Krebs N. Odors and Pheromones: Influences of Olfaction on Behavior, Physiology, and Performance to
reduce Stress in Pigs. PhD Dissertation (Doctor of Philosophy in Animal Science)‹Texas Tech University,
Lubbock. 2007.
33. Nofre C, Glaser D, Tinti JM, Wanner M. Gustatory responses of pigs to sixty compounds tasting sweet
to humans. J Anim Physiol An N. 2002; 86:90-96.
Thaler RC, Sulabo RC. Traditional and non-traditional feed additives for swine. Survival. 2004; 84: 87-
1.35.
Nowicki J, Klocek C., Schwarz T. Factors affecting maternal behaviour and responsiveness in sows during
periparturient and lactation periods. Ann Anim Sci. 2012; 2: 455-469.
36. Nowicki J, Swierkosz S, Tuz R, Schwarz T. The influence of aromatized environmental enrichment
objects with changeable aromas on the behaviour of weaned piglets, Vet Archivos. 2015; 85: 425-435.
37. Fraser D. The effect of straw on the behaviour of sows in tether stalls. Anim Prod. 1975; 1: 59-68.
38. Grandin T. Effect of rearing environment and environmental enrichment on behavior and neural development
in young pigs. M.Sc, Dissertation. University of Illinois; 1989.
39. De Assis Maia AP, Sarubbi J, Medeiros BBL, De Moura DJ. Enriquecimento ambiental como medida
para o bem-estar positivo de suõÂnos. R Eletr Gest Educ Tecn Amb. 2013; 14: 2862-2877.
40. Stern S, Andresen N. Performance, site preference, foraging and excretory behaviour in relation to feed
allowance of growing pigs on pasture. Livest Prod Sci. 2003; 79: 257-265.
41. Beattie VE, O'Connell NE. Relationship between rooting behaviour and foraging in growing pigs. Anim
Welfare. 2002; 11: 295-303.
42. Day JEL, Spoolder HAM, Burfoot A, Chamberlain HL, Edwards SA. The separate and interactive effects
of handling and environmental enrichment on the behaviour and welfare of growing pigs. Appl Anim
Behav Sci. 2002; 75: 177-192.
43. Jansen J, Bolhuis JE, Schouten WG, Spruijt BM, Wiegant VM. Spatial learning in pigs: effects of environmental
enrichment and individual characteristics on behaviour and performance. Anim Cogn. 2009;
12:303-315. doi: 10.1007/s10071-008-0191-y PMID: 18795350
44. Sarubbi J. Bem-estar animal nao se restringe as instalacoes e equipamentos: o uso de novas tecnologias.
In: FoÂrum Integral de Suinocultura: Teoria e Pra tica do Bem-Estar Animal na Producao de Suinos,
1, Curitiba. 2011.
45. Ickes BR, Pham TM, Sanders LA, Albeck DS, Mohammed AH, Granholm AC. Long-Term Environmental
Enrichment Leads to Regional Increases in Neurotrophin Levels in Rat Brain. Exp Neurol. 2000;
164: 45-52. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7415 PMID: 10877914
46. Scott K, Taylor L, Gill BP, Edwards SA. Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the
behaviour of finishing pigs in two different housing systems 2. Ratio of pigs to enrichment. Appl Anim
Behav Sci. 2007; 105: 51-58.
47. Blackshaw JK, Thomas FJ, Lee JA. The effect of a fixed or free toy on the growth rate and aggressive
behavior of weaned pigs and the influence of hierarchy on initial investigation of the toys. Appl Anim
Behav Sci. 1997; 53:203-212.
48. Presto MH, Andersson HK, Folestam S, Lindberg JE. (2008). Activity behaviour and social interactions
of pigs raised outdoors and indoors. Archiv Fur Tierzucht. 2008; 51:338-350.
TORNA INDIETRO
Eradicazione di M. hyopneumoniae nel suino: gli strumenti ci sono
I metodi storicamente impiegati per ridurre l’incidenza delle infezioni da M. hyopneumoniae non sembrano attualmente funzionare adeguatamente. I programmi di controllo per questo microrganismo si dividono in due macrocategorie: i programmi che prevedono l’eradicazione dell’agente patogeno e quelli che non la prevedono; a quest’ultima categoria appartengono le strategie che si basano su tre concetti: gestione, prevenzione e trattamento.