1. Agga, G.E., et al., Antimicrobial-Resistant Bacterial Populations and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Obtained from Environments Impacted by Livestock and Municipal Waste. Plos One, 2015. 10(7): p. 19.
2. Brand, A., J.P.T.M. Noordhuizen, and Y.H. Schukken, Herd Health and Production Management in Dairy Practice. 1996, Wageningen: Wageningen Pers.
3. Damm, M., et al., Differential somatic cell count-A novel method for routine mastitis screening in the frame of Dairy Herd Improvement testing programs. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017. 100(6): p. 4926-4940.
4. EMA/CVMP/ESUAVET, European Sales and Use of Antimicrobials for veterinary medicine (ESUAvet). Annual surveillance report for 2024. 2025, EMA/CVMP/ESUAVET.
5. Fusi, V., et al., Observational study on antimicrobial treatment frequencies and culling rates in a cohort of dairy herds in Lodi province (Italy). Animals, 2026. in corso di stampa.
6. Iossa, G. and P.C.L. White, The natural environment: a critical missing link in national action plans on antimicrobial resistance, in Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2018. p. 858+.
7. Jadeja, N.B. and A. Worrich, From gut to mud: dissemination of antimicrobial resistance between animal and agricultural niches. Environmental Microbiology, 2022. 24(8): p. 3290-3306.
8. O'Neill, J., Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. 2016: Government of the United Kingdom.
9. Radostits, O.M., Principles of health management of food-producing animals, in Herd Health - Food Animal Production Medicine, O.M. Radostitis, Editor. 2001, W.B.Saunders Co.: Philadelphia. p. 1-46.
10. Singer, A.C., et al., Review of Antimicrobial Resistance in the Environment and Its Relevance to Environmental Regulators. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2016. 7: p. 22.
11. Van Boeckel, T.P., et al., Global trends in antimicrobial resistance in animals in low- and middle-income countries. Science, 2019. 365(6459): p. 1266-+.
12. Zecconi, A. and M. Cipolla, La messa in asciutta: modalità e approccio terapeutico. Summa animali da reddito 2019(8): p. 5-12.
13. Zecconi, A. and M. Cipolla, La sanità della mammella nella bovina. I ed. 2020: Point veterinaire Italia.
14. Zecconi, A. and M. Cipolla, Il conteggio differenziale delle cellule somatiche: come utilizzarlo al meglio. SUMMA ANIMALI DA REDDITO, 2021. 2021(3): p. 16-24.
15. Zecconi, A. and M. Cipolla, La diagnosi della mastite e le nuove normative in tema di terapia antibiotica Prima parte. SUMMA ANIMALI DA REDDITO, 2022. 2022(3): p. 19-25.
16. Zecconi, A. and M. Cipolla, La diagnosi della mastite e le nuove normative in tema di terapia antibiotica Seconda parte. SUMMA ANIMALI DA REDDITO, 2022. 2022(3): p. 26-32.
17. Zecconi, A. and M. Cipolla, L’asciutta selettiva dopo tre anni di applicazione in allevamento. SUMMA ANIMALI DA REDDITO, 2023. 3(3): p. 31-36.
18. Zecconi, A., et al., Observational study on application of a selective dry-cow therapy protocol based on individual somatic cell count thresholds. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2020. 19(1): p. 1341-1348.
19. Zecconi, A., et al., Total and differential cell counts as a tool to identify intramammary infections in cows after calving. Animals, 2021. 11(727): p. 14.
20. Zecconi, A., et al., Assessment of Subclinical Mastitis Diagnostic Accuracy by Differential Cell Count in Individual Cow Milk. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2018. 18: p. 435-440
TORNA INDIETROEradicazione di M. hyopneumoniae nel suino: gli strumenti ci sono
I metodi storicamente impiegati per ridurre l’incidenza delle infezioni da M. hyopneumoniae non sembrano attualmente funzionare adeguatamente. I programmi di controllo per questo microrganismo si dividono in due macrocategorie: i programmi che prevedono l’eradicazione dell’agente patogeno e quelli che non la prevedono; a quest’ultima categoria appartengono le strategie che si basano su tre concetti: gestione, prevenzione e trattamento.
