Bibliografia
1. Zeder, M.A.; Bradley, D.G.; Smith, B.D.; Emshwiller, E. (Eds.) Documenting Domestication: New Genetic and Archaeological Paradigms; Univ. of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2006.
2. Ashwood, A. Structure and Lameness. In Brahman News; Australian Brahman Breeders’ Association Limited: Rockhampton, QLD, Australia, 2011.
3. Dyce, K.M.; Sack,W.O.;Wensing, C.G. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy, 4th ed.; Saunders: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2010.
4. Langova, L.; Novotna, I.; Nemcova, P.; Machacek, M.; Havlicek, Z.; Zemanova, M.; Chrast, V. Impact of Nutrients on the Hoof Health in Cattle. Animals 2020, 10, 1824.
5. Hahn, M.V.; McDaniel, B.; Wilk, J. Rates of hoof growth and wear in Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1986, 69, 2148-2156.
6. Wheeler, J. Hoof growth: A possible index of nutrition in grazing animals. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 1966, 6, 350-353.
7. Tranter,W.; Morris, R. Hoof growth and wear in pasture-fed dairy cattle. N. Z. Vet. J. 1992, 40, 89-96.
8. Greenough, P.R.; Finlay, J.;Weaver, A. Lameness in Cattle, 2nd ed.; John Wright PSG Inc.: Littleton, MA, USA, 1981.
9. Clark, A.; Rakes, A. Effect of methionine hydroxy analog supplementation on dairy cattle hoof growth and composition. J. Dairy Sci. 1982, 65, 1493-1502.
10. Vermunt, J.J.; Greenough, P.R. Structural characteristics of the bovine claw: Horn growth and wear, horn hardness and claw conformation. Br. Vet. J. 1995, 151, 157-180.
11. Boggs, D.L.; Merkel, R.A.; Doumit, M.E.; Bruns, K. Livestock & Carcasses: An Integrated Approach to Evaluation, Grading, and Selection, 6th ed.; Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company: Dubuque, IA, USA, 2006; p. 251.
12. Daniel, D.L., Jr.; Kriese-Anderson, L. Beef Conformation Basics; Alabama A&M & Auburn Universities Extension: Huntsville, AL, USA, 2018.
13. Wolfe, D.F. Review: Abnormalities of the bull—Occurrence, diagnosis and treatment of abnormalities of the bull, including structural soundness. Animal 2018, 12, s148-s157.
14. Beeson, W.M.; Hunsley, R.E.; Nordby, J.E. Beef Cattle. In Livestock Judging and Evaluation: A Handbook for the Student; INTERSTATE Printers & Publishers Inc.: The Danville, IL, USA, 1970.
15. Hahn, M.V.; McDaniel, B.;Wilk, J. Genetic and Environmental Variation of Hoof Characteristics of Holstein Cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 1984, 67, 2986-2998.
16. Aiello, S.E.; Moses, M.A.; Allen, D.G. (Eds.) The Merck Veterinary Manual, 11th ed.; Merck & Company Incorporated: White Station, NJ, USA, 2016.
17. Radke, A. Collecting Foot Scores for Improved Structure; The Fence Post: Greeley, CO, USA, 2018.
18. Ral, G. Hoof and leg traits in dairy cattle. In Proceedings of the VIth International Symposium on Disorders of the Ruminant Digit, The British Cattle Veterinary Association/University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK, 1990; pp. 219-231.
19. Andersson, L.; Lundström, K. The Influence of Breed, Age, Body Weight and Season on Digital Diseases and Hoof Size in Dairy Cows 3. Zent. Veterinärmedizin Reihe A 1981, 28, 141-151.
20. Jensen, B.R. Genetic Parameter Estimates for Feed and Leg Traits in Red Angus. Masters’ Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA, 2017.
21. Hoblet, K.H. Effects of Nutrition on Hoof Health; Proceedings: FortWayne, Indiana, 2000; pp. 41-48.
22. Lean, I.;Westwood, C.T.; Golder, H.M.; Vermunt, J.J. Impact of nutrition on lameness and claw health in cattle. Livest. Sci. 2013, 156, 71-87.
23. Mülling, C.; Bragulla, H.H.; Reese, S.; Budras, K.D.; Steinberg,W. How structures in bovine hoof epidermis are influenced by nutritional factors. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 1999, 28, 103-108. [PubMed]
24. Puls, R. Mineral Levels in Animal Health; Diagnostic Data; Sherpa International: Darjeeling, India, 1988.
25. Ballantine, H.T.; Socha, M.T.; Tomlinson, D.A.D.; Johnson, A.B.; Fielding, A.S.; Shearer, J.K.; Van Amstel, S.R. Effects of feeding complexed zinc, manganese, copper, and cobalt to late gestation and lactating dairy cows on claw integrity, reproduction, and lactation performance. Prof. Anim. Sci. 2002, 18, 211-218.
26. Hendry, K.A.; MacCallum, A.; Knight, C.; Wilde, C. REVIEW ARTICLE Laminitis in the dairy cow: A cell biological approach. J. Dairy Res. 1997, 64, 475-486. [PubMed]
27. Nocek, J.E. Bovine acidosis: Implications on laminitis. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80, 1005-1028.
28. Greenough, P.R. Bovine Laminitis and Lameness-A Hands on Approach; Saunders Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007; pp. 8-304.
29. Elam, C. Acidosis in feedlot cattle: Practical observations. Anim. Sci. J. 1976, 43, 898-901.
30. Vermunt, J.P. Greenough, Predisposing factors of laminitis in cattle. Brit. Vet. J. 1994, 150, 151-164.
31. Allenstein, L.C. Lamenesses of cattle. Can. Vet. J. 1981, 22, 65.
32. Biggs, R.; Whitworth, B.; Gilliam, J.; Jones, M.; Lalman, D. Foot Rot in Cattle. 2016. Available online: https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/foot-rot-in-cattle.html (accessed on 18 September 2022).
33. Tunstall, J. Lameness in Beef Cattle: Establishing a Knowledge Base. Ph.D. Thesis, Veterinary Medicine, University of Liverpool, UK, 2020.
34. Newcomer, B.W.; Chamorro, M.F. Distribution of lameness lesions in beef cattle: A retrospective analysis of 745 cases. Can. Vet. J. 2016, 57, 401.
35. Fjeldaas, T.; Nafstad, O.; Fredriksen, B.; Ringdal, G.; Sogstad, Å.M. Claw and limb disorders in 12 Norwegian beef-cow herds. Acta Vet. Scand. 2007, 49, 24.
36. Goonewardene, L.; Hand, R. A study of hoof cracks in grazing cattle—Association of age, weight and fatness. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 75, 25-29.
37. Wang, L.; Miller, S.P.; Retallick, K.J.; Moser, D.W. Genetic parameter estimation for foot structure in American Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2017, 95, 100.
38. Mettlen, S. Staying Sound. In Angus Beef Bulletin Extra; American Angus Association: Saint Joseph, MO, USA, 2019.
39. Jeyaruban, G.; Tier, B.; Johnston, D.; Graser, H. Genetic analysis of feet and leg traits of Australian Angus cattle using linear and threshold models. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2012, 52, 1-10.
40. Gard, J.A.; van Santen, E. Effect of exercise and environmental terrain on development of the digital cushion and bony structures of the bovine foot. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2015, 76, 246-252.
41. Van Dorp, T.E.; Boettcher, P.; Schaeffer, L. Genetics of locomotion. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2004, 90, 247-253.
42. Wyffels, S.A.; Boss, D.L.; Sowell, B.F.; DelCurto, T.; Bowman, J.G.; McNew, L.B. Dormant season grazing on northern mixed grass prairie agroecosystems: Does protein supplement intake, cow age, weight and body condition impact beef cattle resource use and residual vegetation cover? PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0240629.
43. NASS. Farms and Land in Farms 2019 Summary. 2020; pp. 5-6. Available online: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Todays_Reports/reports/fnlo0220.pdf (accessed on 7 May 2022).
44. Putnam, D.H.; DelCurto, T. Forage Systems for Arid Areas. Forages Sci. Grassl. Agric. 2020, 2, 433-451.
45. Anderson, D.M.; Kothmann, M. Relationship of Distance Traveled with Diet and Weather for Hereford Heifers. J. Range Manag. 1980, 33, 217-220.
46. Cory, V.L. Activities of Livestock on the Range; Texas Agricultural Experiment Station: College Station, TX, USA, 1927.
47. Walburger, K.J.; Wells, M.; Vavra, M.; DelCurto, T.; Johnson, B.; Coe, P. Influence of Cow Age on Grazing Distribution in a Mixed-Conifer Forest. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 62, 290-296.
48. Parsons, C.; Momont, P.; DelCurto, T.; McInnis, M.; Porath, M.L. Cattle Distribution Patterns and Vegetation Use in Mountain Riparian Areas. J. Range Manag. 2003, 56, 334-341.
49. Roath, L.R.; Krueger,W.C. Cattle Grazing and Behavior on a Forested Range. J. Range Manag. 1982, 35, 332-338.
50. Allred, B.W.; Fuhlendorf, R.G. Hamilton, The role of herbivores in Great Plains conservation: Comparative ecology of bison and cattle. Ecosphere 2011, 2, 1-17.
51. Kohl, M.T.; Krausman, P.R.; Kunkel, K.;Williams, D.M. Bison Versus Cattle: Are They Ecologically Synonymous? Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 66, 721-731.
52. Bailey, D.W.; VanWagoner, H.; Weinmeister, R. Individual Animal Selection Has the Potential to Improve Uniformity of Grazing on Foothill Rangeland. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 59, 351-358.
53. Pauling, R.C.; Speidel, S.E.; Thomas, M.G.; Holt, T.N.; Enns, R.M. Evaluation of moderate to high elevation effects on pulmonary arterial pressure measures in Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 96, 3599-3605.
54. Holt, T.N.; Callan, R.J. Pulmonary arterial pressure testing for high mountain disease in cattle. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2007, 23, 575-596.
55. Ramsey, R.; Doye, D.; Ward, C.; McGrann JFalconer, L.; Bevers, S. Factors Affecting Beef Cow-Herd Costs, Production, and Profits. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2005, 37, 91-99.
56. McFarlane, Z.D.; Boyer, C.; Mulliniks, J.T. Profitability of Developing Beef Heifers on StockpiledWinter Forages. J. Appl. Farm Econ. 2018, 2, 1.
57. Giess, L.K. Development of a Feet and Leg Scoring Method and Selection Tool for Improved Soundness in Red Angus Cattle. Masters’ Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA, 2017.
58. Cundiff, L.V.; Nunez-Dominguez, R.; Dickerson, G.E.; Gregory, K.E.; Koch, R.M. Heterosis for lifetime production in Hereford, Angus, Shorthorn, and crossbred cows. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 70, 2397-2410.
59. Forabosco, F.; Groen, A.F.; Bozzi, R.; Van Arendonk JA, M.; Filippini, F.; Boettcher, P.; Bijma, P. Phenotypic relationships between longevity, type traits, and production in Chianina beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 1572-1580.
60. Giess, L.K.; Jensen, B.R.; Bormann, J.M.; Rolf, M.M.; Weaber, R.L. Genetic parameter estimates for feet and leg traits in Red Angus cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 2021, 99, skab256.
61. Gadberry, S.; Jennings, J.; Ward, H.; Beck, P.; Kutz, B. Troxel, University of Arkansas Research and Extension. Beef cattle production. 2016. Available online: https://www.uaex.uada.edu/publications/pdf/mp184/MP184.pdf (accessed on 10 May
2022).
62. Bruijnis, M.R.N.; Hogeveen, H.; Stassen, E. Assessing economic consequences of foot disorders in dairy cattle using a dynamic stochastic simulation model. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93, 2419-2432. [PubMed]
63. Ritchie, H. Harlan Ritchie’s Brief History of Cattle Type; Cutrer, B.R., Ed.; Ranch House Designs: Wharton, TX, USA, 2012.
64. Kock, R.; Algeo, J. The beef cattle industry: Changes and challenges. J. Anim. Sci. 1983, 57 (Suppl. S2), 28-43.
65. Baltz, T.C.; Goodwin, J.W.; Brown, A., Jr. A review and analysis of beef carcass weight increases: Economic, biological, and industry relationships. Prof. Anim. Sci. 1992, 8, 46-52.
66. Cross, H.R.; Savell, J.; Francis, J.J. National Consumer Retail Beef Study. In 39th Reciprocal Meat Conference; American Meat Science Association: Champaign, IL, USA, 1986.
67. AAA. Frame Score. 2022 [Cited 2022 May 2]; Adapted from the BIF Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement]. Available online: https://www.angus.org/performance/Framescore (accessed on 2 May 2022).
68. McMurray, M. Just how big are our beef cows these days? Feedstuffs 2008, 80, 16-17.
69. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1996.
70. Beck, P.A.; Stewart, C.B.; Gadberry, M.S.; Haque, M.; Biermacher, J. Effect of mature body weight and stocking rate on cow and calf performance, cow herd efficiency, and economics in the southeastern United States. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 94, 1689-1702.
71. Scasta, J.D.; Henderson, L.; Smith, T. Drought effect on weaning weight and efficiency relative to cow size in semiarid rangeland. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 93, 5829-5839.
72. Capper, J.L. The environmental impact of beef production in the United States: 1977 compared with 2007. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 4249-4261.
73. Peel, D.S.J.A. How We Got Here: A Brief History of Cattle and Markets. In FEEDLOT; Feedlot Magazine: Dighton, KS, USA, 2022.
74. USDA. Beef 2007-08, Part III: Changes to the U.S. Beef Cow-Calf Industry, 1993-2008; CEAH: Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2008.
75. Retallick, K.J. New Foot Structure EPDs: Claw Set and Foot Angle. Angus J. 2019.
76. Angus University Webinars. Facts about Foot Scoring, K. Retallick. Webinar. 2020. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdkTZzLeqw8 (accessed on 29 April 2022).
77. Holstein Association USA. Linear Type Evaluations. 2022. Available online: https://www.holsteinusa.com/genetic_evaluations/ss_linear.html (accessed on 24 May 2022).
78. Burke, B.P.; Funk, D.A. Relationship of linear type traits and herd life under different management systems. J. Anim. Sci. 1993, 76, 2773-2782.
79. Kossaibati, M.A.; Esslemont, R.J. The costs of production diseases in dairy herds in England. Vet. J. 1997, 154, 41-51.
80. Garvey, M. Lameness in Dairy Cow Herds: Disease Aetiology, Prevention and Management. Dairy 2022, 3, 199-210.
81. Detweiler, R.A.; Pringle, T.D.; Rekaya, R.;Wells, J.B.; Segers, J.R. The impact of selection using residual average daily gain and marbling EPDs on growth, performance, and carcass traits in Angus steers 1. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 2450-2459.
82. Van Eenennaam, A.L. Improving EPD accuracy by combining EPD information with DNA test results. In Proceedings of the Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef Cattle Conference, Joplin, MO, USA, 31 August-1 September 2011.
TORNA INDIETROEradicazione di M. hyopneumoniae nel suino: gli strumenti ci sono
I metodi storicamente impiegati per ridurre l’incidenza delle infezioni da M. hyopneumoniae non sembrano attualmente funzionare adeguatamente. I programmi di controllo per questo microrganismo si dividono in due macrocategorie: i programmi che prevedono l’eradicazione dell’agente patogeno e quelli che non la prevedono; a quest’ultima categoria appartengono le strategie che si basano su tre concetti: gestione, prevenzione e trattamento.
