immagine

Attività svolta

Desidero ricevere una copia cartacea
Informativa sulla privacy
Iscrizione alla newsletter

Lo sbadiglio contagioso nel suino domestico (Sus scrofa)

Bibliografia

1. Provine, R. R. Faces as releasers of contagious yawning: An approach to face detection using normal human subjects. Bull. Psychonom. Soc. 27(3), 211–214. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334587 (1989).

2. Tinbergen, N., & Perdeck, A. C. On the stimulus situation releasing the begging response in the newly hatched Herring Gull chick

(Larus argentatus argentatus Pont.). Behaviour, 3(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853951X00197 (1951).

3. Vick, S. J. & Paukner, A. Variation and context of yawns in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am. J. Primatol. 72(3), 262–269.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20781 (2010).

4. Palagi, E., Leone, A., Mancini, G. & Ferrari, P. F. Contagious yawning in gelada baboons as a possible expression of empathy. Proc.

Natl. Acad. Sci. 106(46), 19262–19267. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910891106 (2009).

5. Zannella, A., Stanyon, R. & Palagi, E. Yawning and social styles: Different functions in tolerant and despotic macaques (Macaca

tonkeana and Macaca fuscata). J. Comp. Psychol. 131(3), 179. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000062 (2017).

6. Provine, R. R. Yawning as a stereotyped action pattern and releasing stimulus. Ethology 72(2), 109–122. https://doi.

org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1986.tb00611.x (1986).

7. Provine, R. R. Curious behavior: Yawning, laughing, hiccupping, and beyond. Harvard University Press (2012).

8. Baenninger, R. Some comparative aspects of yawning in Betta splendens, Homo sapiens, Panthera leo, and Papio sphinx. J. Comp.

Psychol. 101(4), 349. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.101.4.349 (1987).

9. Palagi, E., Celeghin, A., Tamietto, M., Winkielman, P. & Norscia, I. The neuroethology of spontaneous mimicry and emotional contagion in human and non-human animals. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 111, 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.020

(2020).

10. Reddy, R. B., Krupenye, C., MacLean, E. L. & Hare, B. No evidence for contagious yawning in lemurs. Anim. Cogn. 19(5), 889–898.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-016-0986-1 (2016).

11. Pereira, M. E., Seeligson, M. L. & Macedonia, J. M. The behavioral repertoire of the black-and-white ruffed lemur, Varecia variegata

variegata (Primates: Lemuridae). Folia Primatol. 51(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000156353 (1988).

12. Palagi, E. & Norscia, I. Etologia dell’emozione animale: Studio e interpretazione. Sistemi intelligenti 31(1), 11–32. https://doi.

org/10.1422/92933 (2019).

13. Amici, F., Aureli, F. & Call, J. Response facilitation in the four great apes: Is there a role for empathy?. Primates 55(1), 113–118.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-013-0375-1 (2014).

14. Palagi, E., Norscia, I. & Cordoni, G. Lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) failed to respond to others’ yawn: Experimental and

naturalistic evidence. J. Comp. Psychol. 133(3), 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/com0000175 (2019).

15. Anderson, J. R., Myowa–Yamakoshi, M., & Matsuzawa, T. Contagious yawning in chimpanzees. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci.

271(suppl 6), S468-S470. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0224 (2004).

16. Campbell, M. W. & Cox, C. R. Observational data reveal evidence and parameters of contagious yawning in the behavioral repertoire of captive-reared chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49698-6 (2019).

17. Campbell, M. W. & De Waal, F. B. Ingroup-outgroup bias in contagious yawning by chimpanzees supports link to empathy. PLoS

ONE 6(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018283 (2011).

18. Demuru, E. & Palagi, E. In bonobos yawn contagion is higher among kin and friends. PLoS ONE 7(11), 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/

journal.pone.0049613 (2012).

19. Tan, J., Ariely, D. & Hare, B. Bonobos respond prosocially toward members of other groups. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.

org/10.1038/s41598-017-15320-w (2017).

20. Romero, T., Ito, M., Saito, A. & Hasegawa, T. Social modulation of contagious yawning in wolves. PLoS ONE 9(8), 1. https://doi.

org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105963 (2014).

21. Yonezawa, T., Sato, K., Uchida, M., Matsuki, N. & Yamazaki, A. Presence of contagious yawning in sheep. Anim. Sci. J. 88(1),

195–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12681 (2017).

22. Wojczulanis-Jakubas, K., Plenzler, J. & Jakubas, D. Indications of contagious behaviours in the southern elephant seal: An observational study. Behaviour 156(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003530 (2019).

23. Gallup, A. C., Swartwood, L., Militello, J. & Sackett, S. Experimental evidence of contagious yawning in budgerigars (Melopsittacus

undulatus). Anim. Cogn. 18(5), 1051–1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0873-1 (2015).

24. Guggisberg, A. G., Mathis, J., Schnider, A. & Hess, C. W. Why do we yawn?. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34(8), 1267–1276. https://

doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.03.008 (2010).

25. Palagi, E., Guillén-Salazar, F. & Llamazares-Martín, C. Spontaneous yawning and its potential functions in South American Sea

Lions (Otaria flavescens). Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53613-4 (2019).

26. Zannella, A., Norscia, I., Stanyon, R. & Palagi, E. Testing yawning hypotheses in wild populations of two strepsirrhine species:

Propithecus verreauxi and Lemur catta. Am. J. Primatol. 77(11), 1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22459 (2015).

27. Kubota, N., Amemiya, S., Yanagita, S., Nishijima, T. & Kita, I. Emotional stress evoked by classical fear conditioning induces

yawning behavior in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 566, 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.02.064 (2014).

28. Millen, A. & Anderson, J. R. Neither infants nor toddlers catch yawns from their mothers. Biol. Lett. 7(3), 440–442. https://doi.

org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0966 (2011).

29. Madsen, E. A. & Persson, T. Contagious yawning in domestic dog puppies (Canis lupus familiaris): The effect of ontogeny and

emotional closeness on low-level imitation in dogs. Anim. Cogn. 16(2), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-012-0568-9

(2013)

30. Massen, J. J., Vermunt, D. A. & Sterck, E. H. Male yawning is more contagious than female yawning among chimpanzees (Pan

troglodytes). PLoS ONE 7(7), 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040697 (2012).

31. Norscia, I., Zanoli, A., Gamba, M. & Palagi, E. Auditory contagious yawning is highest between friends and family members:

Support to the emotional bias hypothesis. Front. Psychol. 11, 442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00442 (2020).

32. Norscia, I., Demuru, E. & Palagi, E. She more than he: Gender bias supports the empathic nature of yawn contagion in Homo

sapiens. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3(2), 150459. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150459 (2016).

33. Norscia, I. & Palagi, E. Yawn contagion and empathy in Homo sapiens. PLoS ONE 6(12), 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journ

al.pone.0028472 (2011).

34. Palagi, E., Norscia, I. & Demuru, E. Yawn contagion in humans and bonobos: emotional affinity matters more than species. PeerJ

2, e519. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.519 (2014).

35. Massen, J. J. & Gallup, A. C. Why contagious yawning does not (yet) equate to empathy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 80, 573–585. https

://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.006 (2017).

36. Marino, L., & Colvin, C. M. Thinking pigs: A comparative review of cognition, emotion, and personality in Sus domesticus. Int. J.

Compar. Psychol. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sx4s79c (2015).

37. Weller, J. E., Camerlink, I., Turner, S. P., Farish, M. & Arnott, G. Socialisation and its effect on play behaviour and aggression in

the domestic pig (Sus scrofa). Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40980-1 (2019).

38. Newberry, R. C. & Wood-Gush, D. G. M. Social relationships of piglets in a semi-natural environment. Anim. Behav. 34(5),

1311–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80202-0 (1986).

39. Camerlink, I., Farish, M., D’Eath, R. B., Arnott, G. & Turner, S. P. Long term benefits on social behaviour after early life socialization of piglets. Animals 8(11), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani8110192 (2018).

40. Podgórski, T., Lusseau, D., Scandura, M., Sönnichsen, L. & Jędrzejewska, B. Long-lasting, kin-directed female interactions in a

spatially structured wild boar social network. PLoS ONE 9(6), 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099875 (2014).

41. Goumon, S., Illmann, G., Leszkowová, I., Dostalová, A. & Cantor, M. Dyadic affiliative preferences in a stable group of domestic

pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1, 105045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105045 (2020).

42. Zhang, M. Y. et al. Effects of confinement duration and parity on stereotypic behavioral and physiological responses of pregnant

sows. Physiol. Behav. 179, 369–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.07.015 (2017).

43. Reimert, I., Bolhuis, J. E., Kemp, B. & Rodenburg, T. B. Indicators of positive and negative emotions and emotional contagion in

pigs. Physiol. Behav. 109, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.11.002 (2013).

44. Goumon, S. & Špinka, M. Emotional contagion of distress in young pigs is potentiated by previous exposure to the same stressor.

Anim. Cogn. 19(3), 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0950-5 (2016).

45. Altmann, J. Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49(3–4), 227–266. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685

3974X00534 (1974).

46. Baenninger, R. On yawning and its functions. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 4(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03209394 (1997).

47. Kapitány, R. & Nielsen, M. Are yawns really contagious? A critique and quantification of yawn contagion. Adapt. Hum. Behav.

Physiol. 3(2), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0059-y (2017).

48. Caratti, S. et al. Analysis of 11 tetrameric STRs in wild boars for forensic purposes. For. Sci. Int. Genet. 4(5), 339–342. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2010.07.001 (2010).

49. Kling, D., Tillmar, A. O. & Egeland, T. Familias 3: Extensions and new functionality. For. Sci. Int. Genet. 13, 121–127. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.07.004 (2014).

50. Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. Non parametric statistics for the behavioural sciences, 2nd Edition. Book (1988).

51. Bates, D et al. Package ‘lme4’. Convergence, 12(1), 2. http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/ (2015).

52. Forstmeier, W. & Schielzeth, H. Cryptic multiple hypotheses testing in linear models: overestimated effect sizes and the winner’s

curse. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1038-5 (2011).

53. Dobson, A. J., & Barnett, A. G. An introduction to generalized linear models. CRC press. (2018).

54. Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C. & Tily, H. J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J.

Mem. Lang. 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 (2013).

55. Bretz, F., Hothorn, T., & Westfall, P. Multiple comparisons using R. CRC Press (2016).

56. Zonderland, J. J., Cornelissen, L., Wolthuis-Fillerup, M. & Spoolder, H. A. Visual acuity of pigs at different light intensities. Appl.

Anim. Behav. Sci. 111(1–2), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.05.010 (2008).

57. Lutwyche, R. The Pig: A Natural History. Ivy Press (2019).

58. Koba, Y. & Tanida, H. How do miniature pigs discriminate between people?: Discrimination between people wearing coveralls of

the same colour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 73(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00106-X (2001).

59. Arave, C. W. Assessing sensory capacity of animals using operant technology. J. Anim. Sci. 74(8), 1996–2009. https://doi.

org/10.2527/1996.7481996x (1996).

60. Lomas, C. A., Piggins, D. & Phillips, C. J. C. Visual awareness. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 57(3–4), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/

S0168-1591(98)00100-2 (1998).

61. Giganti, F. & Zilli, I. The daily time course of contagious and spontaneous yawning among humans. J. Ethol. 29(2), 215–219. https

://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-010-0242-0 (2011).

62. Foister, S. et al. Social network properties predict chronic aggression in commercial pig systems. PLoS ONE 13(10), e0205122.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205122(2018) (2018).

63. Maselli, V. et al. Wild boars’ social structure in the Mediterranean habitat. Ital. J. Zool. 81(4), 610–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250

003.2014.953220 (2014).

64. D’Eath, R. B., & Turner, S. P. The natural behaviour of the pig. In The welfare of pigs (pp. 13–45). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.

org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8909-1_2 (2009).

65. Meikle, D. B., Drickamer, L. C., Vessey, S. H., Arthur, R. D. & Rosenthal, T. L. Dominance rank and parental investment in swine

(Sus scrofa domesticus). Ethology 102(8), 969–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1996.tb01174.x (1996).

66. Mauget, R. Behavioural and reproductive strategies in wild forms of Sus scrofa (European wild boar and feral pigs). In The welfare

of pigs (pp. 3–15). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9574-4_1 (1981).

67. Gonyou, H. W. The social behaviour of pigs. Soc. Behav. Farm Anim. 1, 147–176 (2001).

68. Jensen, P. & Wood-Gush, D. G. Social interactions in a group of free-ranging sows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 12(4), 327–337. https

://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(84)90125-4 (1984).

69. Bartholomew, A. J. & Cirulli, E. T. Individual variation in contagious yawning susceptibility is highly stable and largely unexplained

by empathy or other known factors. PLoS ONE 9(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091773 (2014).

70. Reiland, S. Growth and skeletal development of the pig. Acta Radiol. Suppl. 358, 15–22 (1978).

71. Conrad, M. S., Dilger, R. N. & Johnson, R. W. Brain growth of the domestic pig (Sus scrofa) from 2 to 24 weeks of age: a longitudinal

MRI study. Dev. Neurosci. 34(4), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339311 (2012).

72. Kinder, H. A., Baker, E. W. & West, F. D. The pig as a preclinical traumatic brain injury model: current models, functional outcome

measures, and translational detection strategies. Neural Regen. Res. 14(3), 413. https://doi.org/10.4103/1673-5374.245334 (2019).

73. Sauleau, P., Lapouble, E., Val-Laillet, D. & Malbert, C. H. The pig model in brain imaging and neurosurgery. Animal 3(8), 1138–

1151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731109004649 (2009).

74. Ryan, M. C. et al. Miniature pig magnetic resonance spectroscopy model of normal adolescent brain development. J. Neurosci.

Methods 308, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2018.08.008 (2018).

75. Gerencsér, L., Fraga, P. P., Lovas, M., Újváry, D. & Andics, A. Comparing interspecific socio-communicative skills of socialized

juvenile dogs and miniature pigs. Anim. Cogn. 22(6), 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-019-01284-z (2019).

76. Nawroth, C., Ebersbach, M. & von Borell, E. Are juvenile domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) sensitive to the attentive states of

humans? The impact of impulsivity on choice behaviour. Behav. Proc. 96, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.002

(2013).

77. Durrell, J. L., Sneddon, I. A., Oconnell, N. E. & Whitehead, H. Do pigs form preferential associations?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 89,

41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2004.05.003(2004) (2004).

78. Adriaense, J. E. C., Koski, S. E., Huber, L. & Lamm, C. Challenges in the comparative study of empathy and related phenomena in

animals. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 112, 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.021 (2020).

79. Dunbar, R. I. & Shultz, S. Bondedness and sociality. Behaviour 1, 775–803. https://doi.org/10.1163/000579510X501151 (2010).

TORNA INDIETRO
Abbonati per accedere

Dal web internazionale
13/04/2021

Il virus della PRRS ad alta virulenza impatta sul microbiota intestinale

La sindrome riproduttiva e respiratoria suina (PRRS) è una malattia virale caratterizzata da problemi riproduttivi, distress respiratorio e un impatto negativo sul tasso di crescita e sulle condizioni generali dei suini.

 
 

Formazione Settore Agro-Zootecnico

 

 
Formazione a distanza abbinata a SUMMA

SPC-sviluppo-professionale-continuo