1. Toldrá, F. & Aristoy, M. C. Dry cured ham. In: F. Toldrá editor. Handbook of meat processing. Ames, Iowa: Blackwell Publishing;
2010. p. 351–362.
2. European Commission (EC). Food safety and quality. Quality labels. In: Food and agricultural products (DOOR database). European
Commission. 2015. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/quality/door/list.html. Accessed 15May 2018.
3. Bermúdez, R., Franco, D., Carballo, J. & Lorenzo, J. M. Physicochemical changes during manufacture and final sensory
characteristics of dry-cured Celta ham. Effect ofmuscle type. Food Contr. 43, 263–269 (2014).
4. Čandek-Potokar, M. & Škrlep, M. Factors in pig production that impact the quality of dry-cured ham: a review. Anim. 6, 327–338
5. Laureati, M. et al. Characterization and differentiation of Italian Parma, San Daniele and Toscano dry-cured hams: A multi-
disciplinary approach.Meat Sci. 96, 288–94 (2014).
6. Bosi, P. & Russo, V.The production of the heavy pig for high quality processed products. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 3, 309–321 (2004).
7. Pagliarini, E. et al. Influence of pig genetic type on sensory properties and consumer acceptance of Parma, San Daniele and Toscano
dry-cured hams. J. Sci. Food Agric. 96, 798–806 (2016).
8. Lo Fiego, D. P., Santoro, P.,Macchioni, P. & De Leonibus, E. Influence of genetic type, live weight at slaughter and carcass fatness on
fatty acid composition of subcutaneous adipose tissue of raw ham in the heavy pig.Meat Sci. 69, 107–114 (2005).
9. Schiavon, S. et al. Growth performance, and carcass and raw ham quality of crossbred heavy pigs from four genetic groups fed low
protein diets for dry-cured ham production. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 208, 170–181 (2015).
10. Gou, P., Guerrero, L. & Arnau, J. Sex and crossbreed effects on the characteristics of dry-cured ham.Meat Sci. 40, 21–31 (1995).
11. Peloso, J. V., Lopes, P. S., Gomide, L. A. M., Guimarães, S. E. F. & Carneiro, P. L. S. Carcass and ham quality characteristics of heavy
pigs from different genetic groups intended for the production of dry-cured hams.Meat Sci. 86, 371–376 (2010).
12. Rodríguez-Sánchez, J. A. et al.The influence of dietary lysine restriction during the finishing period on growth performance and
carcass, meat, and fat characteristics of barrows and gilts intended for dry-cured ham production. J. Anim. Sci. 89, 3651–3662
13. Schiavon, S. et al. Effects of feed allowance and indispensable amino acid reduction on feed intake, growth performance and carcass
characteristics of growing pigs. PLoS ONE 13, e0195645 (2018).
14. Wang, T. et al. Effects of dietary lysine level on the content and fatty acid composition of intramuscular fat in late-stage finishing pigs.
Can. J. Anim. Sci. 98, 241–249 (2018).
15. Gallo, L. et al. Effect of progressive reduction in crude protein and lysine of heavy pigs diets on some technological properties of
green hams destined for PDO dry-cured ham production.Meat Sci. 121, 135–140 (2016).
16. Suárez-Belloch, J., Latorre, M. A. & Guada, J. A.The effect of protein restriction during the growing period on carcass,meat and fat
quality of heavy barrows and gilts.Meat Sci. 112, 16–23 (2016).
17. Carrapiso, A. I. & García, C. Effect of the Iberian pig line on dry-cured ham characteristics.Meat Sci. 80, 529–53416 (2008).
18. Vitale, M., Corazzin, M., Favotto, S., Saccà, E. & Piasentier, E. Variability in the characteristics of fresh meat and thighs in
relationship to genetic type of the heavy pig. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 8, 561–563 (2008).
19. Canh, T. T. et al. Dietary protein affects nitrogen excretion and ammonia emission from slurry of growing–finishing pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 56, 181–191 (1998).
20. Gallo, L. et al. Growth performance of heavy pigs fed restrictively diets with decreasing crude protein and indispensable amino acids
content. Livest. Sci. 161, 130–138 (2014).
21. Gallo, L. et al. Carcass quality and uniformity of heavy pigs fed restrictive diets with progressive reductions in crude protein and
indispensable amino acids. Livest. Sci. 172, 50–58 (2015).
22. Lambe, N. R. et al. Effects of low protein diets on pigs with a lean genotype 2. Compositional traits measured with computed
tomography (CT).Meat Sci. 95, 129–136 (2013).
23. Wood, J. D. et al. Effects of low protein diets on pigs with a lean genotype. 1. Carcass compositionmeasured by dissection andmuscle
fatty acid composition.Meat Sci. 95, 123–128 (2013).
24. Tous, N., Lizardo, R., Vilà, B. & Gispert, M. Effect of reducing dietary protein and lysine on growth performance, carcass
characteristics, intramuscular fat, and fatty acid profile of finishing barrows 1. J. Anim. Sci. 92, 129–140 (2014).
25. Grassi, S., Casiraghi, E., Benedetti, S. & Alamprese, C. Effect of low-protein diets in heavy pigs on dry-cured ham quality
characteristics.Meat Sci. 131, 152–157 (2017).
26. Ruiz-Carrascal, J., Ventanas, J., Cava, R., Andrés, A. I. & García, C. Texture and appearance of dry cured ham as affected by fat
content and fatty acid composition. Food Res. Intern. 33, 91–95 (2000).
27. Capraro, D., Buccioni, A., Piasentier, E. & Spanghero, M. Feeding finishing heavy pigs with corn silages: effects on backfat fatty acid
composition and ham weight losses during seasoning. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 16, 588–592 (2017).
28. Cecchinato, A., Schiavon, S., Tagliapietra, F. & Gallo, L. Relationships between in vivomeasurements of backfat thickness and several
carcass and ham traits in heavy pigs. Agric Conspec. Sci. 78, 255–258 (2013).
29. Jiménez-Colmenero, F., Ventanas, J. & Toldrá, F. Nutritional composition of dry-cured ham and its role in a healthy diet.Meat Sci.
84, 585–593 (2010).
30. Ruusunen, M. & Puolanne, E. Reducing sodium intake frommeat products - a review.Meat Sci. 70, 531–541 (2005).
31. Blesa, E. et al. Microbiology and physico-chemical changes of dry-cured ham during the post-salting stage as affected by partial
replacement of NaCl by other salts.Meat Sci. 78, 135–142 (2008).
32. Sárraga, C. Meat Proteinases andTheir Relation With Curing. In: Smulders F. J. M., Toldrá F., Flores, J., Prieto, M. editors. New
technologies formeat andmeat products. Nijmegen,The Netherlands: Audet Tijdschriften BV. p. 233–246 (1992).
33. Consortium. Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching. Consortium for Developing
a Guide for the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Agricultural Research and Teaching, Champaign, IL (1988).
34. European Commission (EC). Prosciutto di San Daniele. Protected Designation of Origin. Publication pursuant to article 18/(2) of
the commission regulation (EC) No. 1898/2006, in accordance with the article 17 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2081/92 of July,
14th 1992. Off. J. Eur. Commun. C188, 24–27 (2006).
35. Fontanesi, L. et al. A genome wide association study for backfat thickness in Italian LargeWhite pigs highlights new regions affecting fat deposition including neuronal genes. BMC Genom. 13, 583 (2012).
36. Sturaro, E., Gallo, L., Noventa, M. & Carnier, P.The genetic relationship between enzymatic activity of cathepsin B and firmness of dry-cured hams.Meat Sci. 79, 375–381 (2008).
37. Gaspardo, B., Procida, G., Toso, B. & Stefanon, B. Determination of volatile compounds in San Daniele ham using headspace GC–MS.Meat Sci. 80, 204–209 (2008).
38. Botsoglou, N. A. et al. Rapid, Sensitive, and Specific Thiobarbituric Acid Method for Measuring Lipid Peroxidation in Animal Tissue, Food, and Feedstuff Samples. J. Agric. Food Chem. 42, 1931–1937 (1994).
39. CIE. Recommendations on uniform color spaces-color difference equations psychometric color terms. Paris: Commission International
de L’Eclairage Supplement No. 2 to CIE Publication No. 15 (E-1.3.1) 1971/(TC-1.3) (1978).
40. Tabilo, G., Flores, M., Fiszman, S. M. & Toldrá, F. Postmortemmeat quality and sex affect textural properties and protein breakdown of dry-cured ham.Meat Sci. 51, 255–260 (1999).
41. International AOAC. OfficialMethods of Analysis. 19th ed. Gaithersburg: AOAC International (2012).
42. Careri, M. et al. Sensory property relationships to chemical data of Italian-type dry-cured ham. J. Food Sci. 58, 968–972 (1993).
43. European Union (EU). Regulation (EU) No. 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011. Off J EU. 22/11/2011.
44. Dalla Bona, M., Schiavon, S., Carraro, L. & Gallo, L. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of growing pigs on
different feeding regimes slaughtered at 145 kg BW. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 15, 419–427 (2016).
45. Schäfer, K. Accelerated solvent extraction of lipids for determining the fatty acid composition of biological material. Anal. Chim. Acta 358, 69–77 (1998).
46. Schiavon, S. et al.The influence of different sample preparation procedures on the determination of fatty acid profiles of beef subcutaneous fat, liver andmuscle by gas chromatography. J. Food Comp. Anal. 50, 10–18 (2016).
47. Christie,W.W. Preparation of Ester Derivatives of Fatty Acids for Chromatographic Analysis. In: ChristieWW editor. Advances in
LipidMethodology – Two. Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom: Oily Press. p. 69–111 (1993).
48. Schiavon, S., Bergamaschi, M., Pellattiero, E., Simonetto, A. & Tagliapietra, F. Fatty acid composition of lamb liver, muscle, and adipose tissues in response to rumen-protected conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) supplementation is tissue depended. J. Agric. Food
Chem. 65, 10604–10614 (2017).
L’uso dell’inseminazione artificiale (AI) per i suini da riproduzione è stato fondamentale per facilitare i miglioramenti globali in termini di fertilità, genetica, lavoro e salute della mandria.