1. Burvenich, C., et al. Physiological and Genetic Factors that Influence the Cows Resistance to Mastitis, Especially During Early Lactation. in Int.Symposium on Immunology of Ruminant Mammary Gland. 2000. Stresa It 11-14 June 2000: FIL-IDF.
2. Mallard, B.A., et al., Alteration in immune responsiveness during the peripartum period and its ramification on dairy cow and calf health. J. Dairy Sci., 1998. Vol.81 pp. 585-595.
3. Zecconi, A. and L. Zanini, Asciutta, un costo o un investimento ? Informatore Agrario, 2013. Vol.69 pp. 19 - 22.
4. Church, G.T., et al., The Effect of a Shortened Dry Period on Intramammary Infections During the Subsequent Lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 2008. Vol.91 pp. 4219-4225.
5. Casirani, G., et al., Dare un punteggio al capezzolo per sottrarsi alla mastite. Informatore Zootecnico, 2002 pp. 42-45.
6. Zecconi, A., et al., Effects of herd and physiological status on variation of 16 immunological and inflammatory parameters during drying off and transition cow period Journal of Dairy Research, 2018. Vol.85 pp. 167-173.
7. Piccinini, R., et al., Evaluation of non-specific immune status of heifers in field conditions during the periparturient period. Vet. Res., 2004. Vol.35 pp. 539-550,Piccinini, R., et al., Comparison of blood and milk non-specific immune parameters in heifers after calving in relation to udder health. Vet. Res., 2005. Vol.36 pp. 747-757.
8. Smith, K.L., D.A. Todhunter, and P.S. Schoenberger, Environmental mastitis: cause, prevalence, prevention. J Dairy Sci, 1985. Vol.68 pp. 1531-1553.
9. Tucker, C.B., S.J. Lacy-Hulbert, and J.R. Webster, Effect of milking frequency and feeding level before and after dry off on dairy cattle behavior and udder characteristics. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009. Vol.92 pp. 3194-3203.
10. Gott, P.N., et al., Effect of gradual or abrupt cessation of milking at dry off on milk yield and somatic cell score in the subsequent lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017. Vol.100 pp. 2080-2089.
11. Halasa, T., et al., Meta-analysis of dry cow management for dairy cattle. Part 1. Protection against new intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009. Vol.92 pp. 3134-3149.
12. Halasa, T., et al., Meta-analysis of dry cow management for dairy cattle. Part 2. Cure of existing intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science, 2009. Vol.92 pp. 3150-3157.
13. Chantziaras, I., et al., Correlation between veterinary antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals: a report on seven countries. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2014. Vol.69 pp. 827-834.
14. Mollenkopf, D.F., et al., Association of dry cow therapy with the antimicrobial susceptibility of fecal coliform bacteria in dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2010. Vol.96 pp. 30-35.
15. Rajala-Schultz, P.J., et al., Antimicrobial resistance and genotypic characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococci over the dry period. Veterinary Microbiology, 2009. Vol.134 pp. 55-64.
16. Erskine, R.J., et al. Bovine mastitis pathogens and trends in resistance to antibacterial drugs. in 43rd NMC annual meeting. 2004. Charlotte (1-4/02/2004).
17. Metzger, S.A. and J.S. Hogan, Short communication: Antimicrobial susceptibility and frequency of resistance genes in Escherichia coli isolated from bovine mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013. Vol.96 pp. 3044-3049.
18. Robert, A., H. Seegers, and N. Bareille, Incidence of intramammary infections during the dry period without or with antibiotic treatment in dairy cows - a quantitative analysis of published data. Veterinary Research, 2006. Vol.37 pp. 25-48.
19. Huijps, K. and H. Hogeveen, Stochastic modeling to determine the economic effects of blanket, selective, and no dry cow therapy. Journal of Dairy Science, 2007. Vol.90 pp. 1225-1234.
20. Rajala-Schultz, P.J., A.H. Torres, and F.J. DeGraves, Milk yield and somatic cell count during the following lactation after selective treatment of cows at dry-off. Journal of Dairy Research, 2011. Vol.78 pp. 489-499.
21. Gruet, P., et al., Bovine mastitis and intramammary drug delivery: review and perspectives. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2001. Vol.50 pp. 245-259.
22. Scherpenzeel, C.G.M., et al., Effect of different scenarios for selective dry-cow therapy on udder health, antimicrobial usage, and economics. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016. Vol.99 pp. 3753-3764.
23. Osteras, O. and L. Sandvik, Effects of selective dry-cow therapy on culling rate, clinical mastitis, milk yield and cow somatic cell count. A randomized clinical field study in cows. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B-Infectious Diseases and Veterinary Public Health, 1996. Vol.43 pp. 555-575.
24. Berry, E.A. and J.E. Hillerton, The effect of selective dry cow treatment on new intramammary infections. Journal of Dairy Science, 2002. Vol.85 pp. 112-121.
25. Sanford, C.J., et al., Test characteristics from latent-class models of the California Mastitis Test. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2006. Vol.77 pp. 96-108.
26. Whist, A.C. and O. Osteras, Associations between somatic cell counts at calving or prior to drying-off and future somatic cell counts, in the remaining or subsequent lactation. Journal of Dairy Research, 2006. Vol.73 pp. 277-287.
27. Godden, S.M., et al., Evaluation of an automated milk leukocyte differential test and the California Mastitis Test for detecting intramammary infection in early- and late-lactation quarters and cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2017. Vol.100 pp. 6527-6544.
28. Huxley, J.N., et al., Evaluation of the efficacy of an internal teat sealer during the dry period. Journal of Dairy Science, 2002. Vol.85 pp. 551-561.
29. Robert, A., et al., Risk factors for new intramammary infections during the dry period in untreated dairy cows from herds using selective dry cow therapy. Animal, 2008. Vol.2 pp. 247-254.
30. Torres, A.H., et al., Using dairy herd improvement records and clinical mastitis history to identify subclinical mastitis infections at dry-off. Journal of Dairy Research, 2008. Vol.75 pp. 240-247.
31. Zecconi, A., et al., Somatic Cell Count as a Decision Tool for Selective Dry Cow Therapy in Italy. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2018. Vol.17 pp. 1-6.
L’alimentazione ha riflessi su molteplici aspetti: fertilità, produzione di latte, immunità, produzione di lana, adattamento ai diversi stress ambientali.